Long Answer
Hard difficulty • Structured explanation
Question 1
Long FormCompare and contrast the SN1 and SN2 mechanisms of nucleophilic substitution in haloalkanes with respect to kinetics, stereochemistry, effect of substrate structure, and solvent.
- SN2 follows second-order kinetics (rate depends on both substrate and nucleophile concentrations) and proceeds in a single concerted step with no intermediate; the nucleophile attacks the carbon from the back, causing Walden inversion of configuration at the chiral centre.
- SN1 follows first-order kinetics (rate depends only on substrate concentration) and proceeds in two steps: slow ionisation to form a planar carbocation, followed by fast nucleophilic attack from either face, giving racemisation.
- Substrate structure: SN2 reactivity is CH3X > 1° > 2° > 3° (steric hindrance decreases reactivity); SN1 reactivity is 3° > 2° > 1° (carbocation stability governs rate). Allylic and benzylic halides are reactive in SN1 due to resonance-stabilised carbocations.
- Polar protic solvents (water, alcohol) favour SN1 by stabilising the ion pair intermediate and the halide leaving group through solvation; polar aprotic solvents or less polar conditions favour SN2 by not solvating the nucleophile and allowing it to attack freely.
- For a given alkyl group, reactivity of halide in both mechanisms follows R–I > R–Br > R–Cl >> R–F, as iodine is the best leaving group due to its large size and weak C–I bond.