Application Question
Medium difficulty • Concept in a practical situation
Question 1
Applied ConceptA forensic scientist recovers DNA from a hair follicle found at a crime scene. The suspect claims he was never at the scene. With reference to DNA fingerprinting, explain how the scientist would use this DNA sample to support or refute the suspect's claim.
- The scientist would extract DNA from the hair follicle and from a blood sample of the suspect, then digest both with restriction endonucleases to generate fragments of varying sizes based on VNTR copy numbers. The fragments would be separated by gel electrophoresis, transferred to a nylon membrane (Southern blotting), and hybridised with a radiolabelled VNTR probe, followed by autoradiography to produce banding patterns.
- If the banding pattern from the crime scene hair matches the suspect's pattern, it would indicate the hair belongs to the suspect, placing them at the scene; a mismatch would exonerate the suspect. The uniqueness of VNTR patterns (differing between all individuals except monozygotic twins) makes this comparison highly reliable as a forensic tool.
- Since DNA from every tissue — including hair follicles — of an individual shows the same degree of VNTR polymorphism (same genetic profile), even trace amounts of biological material can be used; PCR amplification further increases sensitivity, allowing the technique to work on DNA from a single cell.